Renowned political economist and Founder of the Centre for Values in Leadership (CVL), Professor Pat Utomi, has publicly questioned the sustained political and media attacks directed at Peter Obi, the 2023 presidential candidate of the Labour Party.
Utomi expressed concern over why political opponents continue to focus their criticism on a candidate who officially finished third in the 2023 presidential race.
The statement was issued on Tuesday, November 3, 2026, following a series of public engagements and media commentary originating from Lagos, Nigeria, featuring key remarks from Utomi as well as Dr. Yunusa Tanko, Chief Spokesperson for the Peter Obi Media Reach (POMR).
In a detailed commentary released via his official communications channels, Prof. Utomi declared that supporters and democracy advocates would defend Peter Obi’s record against sustained political propaganda, stating firmly that they will defend his legacy without hesitation because history must never be surrendered to corrupt propaganda.
Utomi questioned the rationale of the ruling establishment and political critics who consistently direct their daily political attacks toward Obi rather than focusing on pressing national governance issues.
He noted that despite the official election results placing Obi third behind President Bola Tinubu of the All Progressives Congress (APC) and former Vice President Atiku Abubakar of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), Obi remains the focal point of intense political commentary and blame.
Addressing recent heated debates between political factions, Utomi also highlighted the growing political awareness among Nigerian youth and the electorate ahead of upcoming electoral cycles.
He emphasized that the political consciousness of younger generations cannot be suppressed or bought through conventional patronage or handouts. Reaffirming Obi’s commitment to peaceful democratic engagement, POMR spokesperson Dr. Yunusa Tanko maintained that Obi’s political record remains focused on good governance and economic accountability rather than violence or disruption.
Utomi concluded by reiterating that while constructive criticism remains essential for democratic accountability, orchestrated campaigns aimed at rewriting political history or scapegoating opposition figures would be resisted through factual engagement and public defense.
