In Nigeria’s intricate mosaic, each of the 36 states plays a pivotal role in preserving national unity. This is why Nyesom Wike’s recent threat to “set fire” to states whose governors support Rivers State Governor Siminalayi Fubara is not just troubling but also potentially treasonous.
Wike’s declaration, made with his usual bravado, overlooks a critical reality: by threatening any state in Nigeria, he is effectively threatening the entire nation. The potential repercussions of such reckless rhetoric are profound. At a time when Nigeria’s stability is already under strain from economic and social challenges, political leaders should avoid making incendiary statements that could fuel further division and unrest.
As a lawyer, Wike should be acutely aware of the legal and constitutional implications of his words. By threatening to set fire to states that are integral to the Nigerian federation, he is attacking more than just individual entities; he is endangering Nigeria’s unity and sovereignty. Such statements, whether born out of frustration or political maneuvering, are extremely irresponsible and verge on treason.
Nigeria’s constitution is explicit about the gravity of actions or speech that threaten the country’s peace and sovereignty. Wike’s statement edges dangerously close to this line. A threat to burn down states simply because their governors support Fubara is an assault on Nigeria as a whole.
At this point, the presidency must intervene and hold Wike accountable. The highest office in the land must remind him that no one, regardless of their political status, is above the law or the unity of Nigeria. Wike’s recent actions suggest he is overreaching in his role as FCT Minister, attempting to exert influence and power far beyond his mandate.
This is a time for leaders to unite the country, not divide it. Wike must understand that his words carry consequences far beyond the borders of Rivers State or the Federal Capital Territory. The implications of such threats could be catastrophic, setting a dangerous precedent where political disagreements are resolved through threats of violence instead of dialogue and negotiation.
Nigeria’s democracy is grounded in the principle of federalism, which allows all 36 states to govern without interference or threats from any individual, no matter how powerful. Wike’s comments are a blatant violation of this principle and must be condemned in the strongest terms.
Leaders at all levels must demonstrate restraint and wisdom when making public statements. The security and unity of Nigeria should be their foremost priority. Wike, like every other Nigerian leader, must be held accountable for his words and actions. His recent threat is not only reckless but verges on treason, jeopardizing the very fabric of the country he once vowed to serve and protect. The presidency cannot ignore this; swift action is needed to reaffirm that Nigeria’s unity is sacred and cannot be compromised by anyone, no matter how powerful.
Without question, the minister’s statement is both alarming and treasonous. Such rhetoric, particularly from a high-ranking public official, has far-reaching implications for Nigeria’s national security, political stability, and legal system.
Wike’s statement is particularly concerning given Nigeria’s fragile political landscape and the high ethnic and regional tensions. Any call to incite violence, especially in the context of interstate conflict, risks spiraling out of control, leading to a breakdown of law and order. The Federal Republic of Nigeria’s constitution underscores the importance of maintaining national unity, peace, and security.
Section 14(2)(b) of Nigeria’s 1999 Constitution (as amended) states that “the primary purpose of government shall be the security and welfare of the people.” By threatening to incite violence, Wike appears to be violating this constitutional mandate, as such actions could jeopardize the security and welfare of citizens in the affected states. This alone could be grounds for legal action against him, as it directly contradicts the responsibilities of any public officer.
Moreover, his threat could be interpreted as incitement to violence, a serious offense under Nigerian law. According to Section 50(2) of the Criminal Code Act, “any person who by any means whatsoever aids, counsels, or procures the commission of an offence, or who incites any other person to commit an offence, is guilty of the same offence and liable to the same punishment.”
Given that Wike’s statement could be seen as inciting governors and supporters to engage in violence, he could face criminal charges under this provision. Furthermore, if such violence leads to the destabilization of the Nigerian state or the overthrow of a duly elected government, it could be deemed treason, a capital offense under Nigerian law.
His remarks also raise serious concerns about abuse of power and political intimidation. As a former governor and current minister, Wike wields significant influence in Nigerian politics. His threat to “set fire” to states that oppose his political interests could be seen as an attempt to coerce other political actors into submission, undermining democratic principles.
Section 15(5) of the 1999 Constitution explicitly states that “the State shall abolish all corrupt practices and abuses of authority.” Wike’s statement directly contravenes this constitutional mandate, implying the use of political power for personal gain and retribution. This sets a dangerous precedent for political conduct in Nigeria, potentially eroding public trust in the political system.
Given these serious implications, the relevant authorities, including the Nigerian judiciary and the National Assembly, must investigate Wike’s alleged statement and take appropriate action. Public officials must be held accountable for their words and actions, especially when they threaten the nation’s peace, security, and unity.
Furthermore, political leaders must practice restraint and engage in constructive dialogue rather than resorting to threats of violence. Nigerian democracy can only thrive if its leaders respect the rule of law and prioritize the greater good over personal vendettas.
In summary, Wike’s threat to “set fire” to states whose governors support Siminalayi Fubara is not only dangerous but also potentially treasonous. Such statements undermine Nigeria’s national unity, incite violence, and represent an abuse of political power. The relevant authorities must address this issue immediately and ensure that public officials are held accountable for their actions. This is crucial for the survival of Nigerian democracy and the rule of law.
