The Inspector-General of Police has urged the Federal High Court in Abuja to dismiss a fundamental rights enforcement suit filed by former Kaduna State governor, Nasir El-Rufai, describing the action as an attempt to obstruct an ongoing investigation.
El-Rufai had approached the court seeking N1 billion in compensation from the Independent Corrupt Practices and Other Related Offences Commission, the Chief Magistrate Court of the Federal Capital Territory, the Inspector-General of Police, and the Attorney-General of the Federation over a search conducted at his residence in Abuja.
The former governor is challenging what he described as an unlawful invasion of his home in the Asokoro district of the Federal Capital Territory, during which law enforcement agents allegedly recovered some items.
However, in a counter-affidavit filed before the Federal High Court in Abuja, the Inspector-General of Police argued that the suit lacks merit and should be dismissed.
The police chief maintained that the search operation was conducted legally and in line with the powers granted to law enforcement agencies under Nigerian law.
According to the affidavit, the police acted based on a valid search warrant issued by a competent court, stressing that the operation was part of a lawful investigation.
The police further contended that El-Rufai’s court action appeared to be a deliberate move to shield himself from investigation and potential prosecution.
“The Nigeria Police Force has the statutory powers to detect, arrest, investigate and prosecute offenders,” the affidavit stated, adding that the search carried out at the former governor’s residence was within the bounds of the law.
The IGP also insisted that the search warrant was properly obtained and executed in accordance with legal procedures, dismissing allegations that the operation violated El-Rufai’s fundamental rights.
El-Rufai’s suit seeks financial compensation and a declaration that the search of his residence was unlawful, while also asking the court to hold the law enforcement agencies responsible for alleged violations of his rights.
Legal observers say the case could test the boundaries between law enforcement powers and the protection of fundamental rights, particularly when high-profile political figures are involved.
The matter is expected to continue before the Federal High Court as the parties present their arguments over the legality of the search and the claims for damages made by the former governor.
